Problem
The final edit depends on editorial discipline: weak shots were rejected, the shot order was locked, bad audio was replaced, and the sequence was kept to a clean courtyard rhythm without title burn-ins.
Case study 162026
Okhta Playground Courtyard Film
A source-backed Okhta courtyard film with final MP4, edit notes, shot order, and embedded video proof.
View project↗Okhta
- Case type
- Residential development film
- Role
- Video Editor
- Period
- 2026
- Status
- Locked final edit
01
Problem and solution
Solution
A courtyard film proof with a locked six-shot edit, child-scale movement, ambient sound, and explicit rejected-shot boundaries.
My role
Video EditorEdited the final six-shot sequence around child-scale movement, wood detail, empty courtyard breath, and final play moment.
02
Research
Courtyard behaviour study
Instead of listing amenities, the film shows use: movement, play, adult supervision and the courtyard's relationship to architecture.
Amenities become valuable when the human scenario, not just the equipment, is visible.
The developer page frames the project around low-rise living, Mistolovo, Okhta Park access, and a closed courtyard where the forest begins.
The public page lists car-free courtyard scenarios, gazebos, loungers, sport, and outdoor cinema as courtyard amenities.
The locked edit notes specify a six-shot no-title picture structure.
Rejected swing and girl replacement shots are explicitly excluded from the final edit.
03
Information architecture
Courtyard sequence
The edit links wide context, action and detail into one calm everyday scene.
- 01Wide context→
- 02Enter the action→
- 03Play→
- 04Environmental details→
- 05Connection to home
Okhta
- 01
Edited the final six-shot sequence around child-scale movement, wood detail, empty courtyard breath, and final play moment.
- 02
Maintained the rejected-shot list so earlier visual mistakes do not return to the public proof.
- 03
Prepared the case around the locked edit notes rather than inventing a general family-amenity story.
04
Visual concept
The project's character becomes its own presentation system
The mockup does not disguise the interface: environment, colour, scale and medium extend the logic of the project itself.
- 01
Natural movement
- 02
No staged advertising feel
- 03
Human scale
05
Design and system behaviour
Not a gallery of pictures, but a sequence of states
Each visual is tied to a journey stage and demonstrates a distinct part of the solution.
06 / Motion proof
Okhta playground courtyard final edit
Web proof export generated from the locked final edit. The source folder preserves edit notes, base render, alternate music, and rejected-shot boundaries.07
Validation and outcome
Result and system scope
A source-backed Okhta courtyard film with final MP4, edit notes, shot order, and embedded video proof.
What can be verified
- 01
Final source: okhta/video/projects/2026-05-27_playground-courtyard/generations/FINAL/playground-courtyard-final.mp4.
- 02
Edit notes record the locked shot order, audio workflow, and do-not-use list.
- 03
The proof page embeds a compressed local MP4 made from the final source file.
Role boundaries
Agency work at Lex Wizhevsky Architects · Role: Video EditorAgency work is credited to Lex Wizhevsky Architects.
The development, children footage, render source, and client relationship are not presented as Vellum-owned.
Outcome
A courtyard film proof with a locked six-shot edit, child-scale movement, ambient sound, and explicit rejected-shot boundaries.
Open verified source ↗Discuss a related project
Need a website, product interface or automation system?
Send the current surface, goal and constraints. I will propose a route from diagnosis to a verifiable release.
Discuss a related project↗